IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trey Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 46 1 15 16 0.348 0.0804 0.0876 0.2812 0.3064
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 43 5 22 27 0.628 0.2230 0.2329 0.7366 0.7370
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 29 2 6 8 0.276 0.1628 0.1548 0.8129 0.7729
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 30 2 12 14 0.467
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 36 3 14 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2024-25 · UConn
+168.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6624
Defenseman overall
#1633
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Nault
St. Thomas · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.