| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Cretin-Derham Hall | USHS-MN | 26 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 0.615 | 0.1657 | 0.1657 | 0.1495 | 0.1495 |
| 2020-21 | Cretin-Derham Hall | USHS-MN | 20 | 18 | 19 | 37 | 1.850 | 0.4980 | 0.4980 | 0.4494 | 0.4494 |
| 2021-22 | Cretin-Derham Hall | USHS-MN | 29 | 23 | 29 | 52 | 1.793 | 0.4827 | 0.4827 | 0.4355 | 0.4355 |
| 2022-23 | — | USHL | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.083 | 0.0530 | 0.0554 | 0.2496 | 0.2609 |
| 2023-24 | — | USHL | 51 | 23 | 24 | 47 | 0.922 | 0.5869 | 0.5843 | 2.7618 | 2.7498 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | — | 43 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 0.442 |
| 2024-25 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | — | 42 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0.357 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.