← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Fisher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-27 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 26 11 5 16 0.615 0.1657 0.1657 0.1495 0.1495
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 18 19 37 1.850 0.4980 0.4980 0.4494 0.4494
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 29 23 29 52 1.793 0.4827 0.4827 0.4355 0.4355
2022-23 USHL 12 1 0 1 0.083 0.0530 0.0554 0.2496 0.2609
2023-24 USHL 51 23 24 47 0.922 0.5869 0.5843 2.7618 2.7498
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Denver D1 NCHC 43 8 11 19 0.442
2024-25 Denver D1 NCHC 42 8 7 15 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2024-25 · Denver
+11.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4965
Forward overall
#225
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.