← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivier Beaulieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 28 0 10 10 0.357 0.1330 0.1405 0.7366 0.7620
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 5 25 30 0.556 0.2070 0.2092 0.8096 0.8184
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 18 1 2 3 0.167 0.0829 0.0778 0.4446 0.4171
2025-26 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 24 4 25 29 1.208 0.4501 0.4158 1.7606 1.6265
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA FR 14 0 4 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Northern Michigan
+132.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3574
Defenseman overall
#953
Defenseman born in 2005
#899
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.