IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivier Beaulieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 28 0 10 10 0.357 0.1376 0.1454 0.7509 0.7768
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 5 25 30 0.556 0.2141 0.2164 0.8086 0.8174
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 18 1 2 3 0.167 0.0819 0.0768 0.4451 0.4176
2025-26 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 24 4 25 29 1.208 0.4656 0.4301 1.7584 1.6244
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA FR 14 0 4 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Northern Michigan
+128.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3736
Defenseman overall
#976
Defenseman born in 2005
#822
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.