← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Clegg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1856 0.4627 0.5122
2017-18 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 59 19 13 32 0.542 0.1819 0.1911 0.5019 0.5273
2018-19 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 54 32 38 70 1.296 0.4348 0.4357 1.1996 1.2020
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 11 1 3 4 0.364
2021-22 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 17 6 3 9 0.529
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 27 2 3 5 0.185
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2019-20 · Robert Morris
-36.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13887
Forward overall
#592
Forward born in 2000
#211
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2014-15
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.