← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zane Kindrachuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 50 7 20 27 0.540 0.1811 0.1900 0.5005 0.5252
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 59 17 18 35 0.593 0.1990 0.1992 0.5498 0.5502
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 54 27 32 59 1.093 0.3665 0.3665 1.0126 1.0126
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 6 3 3 6 1.000 0.3354 0.3354 0.9268 0.9268
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC 25 11 11 22 0.880
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC 26 10 7 17 0.654
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC 19 7 7 14 0.737
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19004
Forward overall
#842
Forward born in 2000
#430
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2021-22
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.