← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-22 Country: Canada
2020 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 21 29 50 0.833 0.2795 0.3102 0.7711 0.8559
2018-19 Canmore Eagles AJHL 59 34 40 74 1.254 0.4207 0.4465 1.1606 1.2319
2019-20 Canmore Eagles AJHL 53 36 46 82 1.547 0.5189 0.5189 1.4318 1.4318
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC 37 6 3 9 0.243
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC 40 21 18 39 0.975
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC 39 10 21 31 0.795
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC 21 6 7 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Colgate
+84.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8078
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 2001
#71
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.