← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-22 Country: Canada
2020 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #196  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 21 29 50 0.833 0.2765 0.3069 0.7723 0.8572
2018-19 Canmore Eagles AJHL 59 34 40 74 1.254 0.4161 0.4417 1.1624 1.2338
2019-20 Canmore Eagles AJHL 53 36 46 82 1.547 0.5134 0.5134 1.4339 1.4339
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC 37 6 3 9 0.243
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC 40 21 18 39 0.975
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC 39 10 21 31 0.795
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC 21 6 7 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Colgate
+86.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7607
Forward overall
#311
Forward born in 2001
#77
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.