← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adyn Merrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-23 Country: USA
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 40 10 8 18 0.450 0.1653 0.1861
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 43 4 6 10 0.233 0.0896 0.0949 0.3385 0.3584
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 28 6 5 11 0.393 0.2318 0.2276 1.1800 1.1584
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 17 23 40 0.784 0.4627 0.4319 2.3556 2.1987
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10691
Forward overall
#477
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2012-13
0.56
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
BCHL 2013-14
0.18
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
BCHL 2021-22
0.43
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
USHL 2019-20
0.22
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.