← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Faremouth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NAHL 43 6 12 18 0.419 0.1538 0.1645 0.4418 0.4724
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 60 7 3 10 0.167 0.0983 0.0970 0.5007 0.4940
2019-20 USHL 41 10 14 24 0.585 0.3453 0.3453 1.7582 1.7582
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 49 11 9 20 0.408 0.2408 0.2408 1.2260 1.2260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 33 8 5 13 0.394
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 34 6 6 12 0.353
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 27 0 3 3 0.111
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA FR 32 3 4 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2021-22 · Ferris State
+106.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21212
Forward overall
#971
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.