← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Macaulay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1659 0.1929 0.4634 0.5388
2018-19 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1659 0.1849 0.4634 0.5164
2019-20 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 51 1 13 14 0.275 0.0911 0.0911 0.2544 0.2544
2020-21 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 16 1 7 8 0.500 0.1659 0.1659 0.4634 0.4634
2021-22 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 56 9 33 42 0.750 0.2488 0.2409 0.6951 0.6732
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 28 0 2 2 0.071
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 34 5 10 15 0.441
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 33 2 7 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Alaska Fairbanks
+32.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7506
Defenseman overall
#1776
Defenseman born in 2002
#1174
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.