← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Carney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2794 0.2660 0.6901 0.6570
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC GR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2011-12 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 18 1 5 6 0.333
2010-11 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 7 1 2 3 0.429
2009-10 Bowdoin D3 FR 3 0 2 2 0.667

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.