← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Kinash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Metro Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 60 17 25 42 0.700 0.2348 0.2344 0.6478 0.6466
2019-20 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 35 18 22 40 1.143 0.3833 0.3833 1.0576 1.0576
2024-25 Toronto Metro Univ. USports-M 15 1 3 4 0.267 0.1407 0.1276 0.7817 0.7090
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 18 2 4 6 0.333
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 20 0 1 1 0.050
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22796
Forward overall
#1129
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2011-12
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.