← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 45 6 18 24 0.533 0.1789 0.1789 0.4943 0.4943
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 18 1 15 16 0.889 0.2981 0.2981 0.8238 0.8238
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 40 4 24 28 0.700 0.2348 0.2200 0.6488 0.6080
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA GR 29 1 13 14 0.483
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 34 2 27 29 0.853
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 26 7 25 32 1.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2022-23 · Long Island Univ.
+492.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4731
Defenseman overall
#1105
Defenseman born in 2001
#589
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2002-03
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.