← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Zocco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Coquitlam Express BCHL 49 19 34 53 1.082 0.4167 0.4302 1.5731 1.6239
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 22 48 70 1.167 0.6882 0.6588 3.5009 3.3512
2026-27 London Knights OHL 5 4 2 6 1.200 0.6942 0.6942 3.1421 3.1421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4271
Forward overall
#68
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2024-25
1.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
AJHL 2016-17
0.29
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NCDC 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
QMJHL 2023-24
0.88
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.