← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayson Dietrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 51 10 13 23 0.451 0.1496 0.1496 0.4180 0.4180
2020-21 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 10 5 4 9 0.900 0.2986 0.2986 0.8341 0.8341
2021-22 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 52 17 28 45 0.865 0.2871 0.2735 0.8021 0.7642
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SR 36 1 4 5 0.139
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA 32 5 6 11 0.344
2023-24 American International D1 AHA 19 2 1 3 0.158
2022-23 American International D1 AHA 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20007
Forward overall
#939
Forward born in 2001
#576
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.