IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Schulmeister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4634 0.4634
2022-23 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 44 4 4 8 0.182 0.0350 0.0340 0.1146 0.1114
2023-24 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 37 1 4 5 0.135 0.0260 0.0239 0.0851 0.0783
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 18 0 1 1 0.056
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#59052
Forward overall
#4166
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Shelafoe
Hamline · 2005-06
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Henry
Trine · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Plese
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.