← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Fink Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 AJHL 60 19 34 53 0.883 0.2950 0.3243 0.8200 0.9016
2022-23 AJHL 54 41 56 97 1.796 0.6000 0.6300 1.6675 1.7508
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 30 10 28 38 1.267
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 40 23 30 53 1.325
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 34 15 19 34 1.000
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 30 3 5 8 0.267

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.72 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.