← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tate Pritchard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lakeville South USHS-MN 23 2 5 7 0.304 0.0819 0.0819 0.0739 0.0739
2021-22 Lakeville South USHS-MN 30 18 16 34 1.133 0.3051 0.3051 0.2753 0.2753
2022-23 Lakeville South USHS-MN 29 28 29 57 1.966 0.5291 0.5291 0.5250 0.5625
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 57 13 16 29 0.509 0.3128 0.3060 1.4990 1.4662
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 19 34 53 0.982 0.6033 0.5593 2.8917 2.6808
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 31 4 6 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2025-26 · Minnesota
-17.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5629
Forward overall
#174
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.