IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lonny Forrester Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-11-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Estevan Bruins SJHL 60 21 36 57 0.950 0.2434 0.2579 0.7161 0.7586
2001-02 Estevan Bruins SJHL 62 35 29 64 1.032 0.2645 0.2674 0.7781 0.7866
2002-03 Estevan Bruins SJHL 58 32 36 68 1.172 0.3004 0.2875 0.8838 0.8459
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 7 15 22 0.733
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 25 7 16 23 0.920
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 30 13 10 23 0.767
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 20 1 5 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+25.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13723
Forward overall
#450
Forward born in 1982
#85
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Felan
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2011-12
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.