IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lonny Forrester Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-11-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Estevan Bruins SJHL 60 21 36 57 0.950 0.2745 0.2908 0.7152 0.7577
2001-02 Estevan Bruins SJHL 62 35 29 64 1.032 0.2982 0.3015 0.7771 0.7856
2002-03 Estevan Bruins SJHL 58 32 36 68 1.172 0.3387 0.3242 0.8826 0.8448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 — SR 30 7 15 22 0.733
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 — JR 25 7 16 23 0.920
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 — SO 30 13 10 23 0.767
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 — FR 20 1 5 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+11.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9693
Forward overall
#370
Forward born in 1982
#98
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Felan
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.