← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Muthersbaugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 3 4 7 0.259 0.0731 0.0731 0.1187 0.1187
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 12 20 6 26 2.167 0.6112 0.6112 0.9915 0.9915
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 48 21 13 34 0.708 0.3949 0.4261 0.5727 0.6179
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 58 21 19 40 0.690 0.2733 0.2824 0.7241 0.7482
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 30 9 7 16 0.533 0.3278 0.3081 1.5712 1.4770
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 19 17 36 1.000
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC 36 13 15 28 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2024-25 · Union
+205.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13449
Forward overall
#616
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.