← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Roed Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-25 Country: USA
2025 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #214  ·  Colorado Avalanche Colorado Avalanche
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 White Bear Lake USHS-MN 27 19 19 38 1.407 0.3789 0.3789 0.3419 0.3419
2022-23 White Bear Lake USHS-MN 26 23 27 50 1.923 0.5177 0.5177 0.4671 0.4671
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 25 6 9 15 0.600 0.3688 0.3779 1.7677 1.8113
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 61 27 33 60 0.984 0.6046 0.5887 2.8979 2.8215
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 36 5 13 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · St. Cloud State
+6.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5259
Forward overall
#150
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.