← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Barlage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 49 1 8 9 0.184 0.0471 0.0471 0.1361 0.1361
2020-21 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.0854 0.0854 0.2470 0.2470
2021-22 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 58 8 34 42 0.724 0.1855 0.1912 0.5366 0.5532
2022-23 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 54 6 30 36 0.667 0.1708 0.1675 0.4941 0.4847
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 57 2 5 7 0.123 0.0724 0.0648 0.3618 0.3241
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 31 0 4 4 0.129
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 15 0 2 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2024-25 · Alaska Fairbanks
+33.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10709
Defenseman overall
#2267
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.