← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Boots Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 36 6 4 10 0.278 0.0603 0.0677 0.2150 0.2413
2003-04 Cornwall Colts CCHL 53 18 35 53 1.000 0.2169 0.2326 0.7741 0.8302
2004-05 Cornwall Colts CCHL 52 28 25 53 1.019 0.2211 0.2274 0.7890 0.8116
2005-06 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 42 42 84 1.500 0.3254 0.3203 1.1612 1.1432
2006-07 CCHL 54 33 41 74 1.370 0.2972 0.2779 1.0608 0.9919
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 30 13 15 28 0.933
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 28 15 25 40 1.429
2009-10 Ohio State D1 SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2008-09 Ohio State D1 FR 32 9 16 25 0.781
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2008-09 · Ohio State
+209.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7732
Forward overall
#263
Forward born in 1986
#46
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.