← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Kvasnicka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-10 Country: USA
2025 · Round 7, Pick #202  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wayzata USHS-MN 28 11 34 45 1.607 0.2035 0.2035 0.3904 0.3904
2023-24 NTDP-U18 30 8 9 17 0.567 0.4212 0.4371 2.1146 2.1942
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 66 18 21 39 0.591 0.4392 0.4351 2.2049 2.1843
2025-26 Penticton Vees WHL 65 35 50 85 1.308 0.6362 0.6440 3.2087 3.2481
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5911
Forward overall
#89
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.31
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2018-19
0.32
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
BCHL 2020-21
0.76
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.