IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Willer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North York Rangers OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0860 0.2292 0.2412
2006-07 North York Rangers OJHL 49 28 27 55 1.122 0.2751 0.2758 0.7719 0.7738
2007-08 North York Rangers OJHL 49 28 26 54 1.102 0.2701 0.2586 0.7578 0.7254
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 12 21 33 1.222
2010-11 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 28 17 18 35 1.250
2009-10 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 29 15 19 34 1.172
2008-09 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 24 3 5 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2008-09 · Elmira
+46.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13206
Forward overall
#516
Forward born in 1988
#355
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Kitto
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Nelson
Lake Forest · 2013-14
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.