IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Callen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Oswego Admirals OJHL 47 18 17 35 0.745 0.1825 0.1978 0.5097 0.5524
2006-07 Oswego Admirals OJHL 11 4 3 7 0.636 0.1560 0.1613 0.4356 0.4503
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 25 10 8 18 0.720
2010-11 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 28 11 19 30 1.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2010-11 · Fitchburg State
+611.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27394
Forward overall
#927
Forward born in 1988
#1363
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Flynn
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lee
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Gazich
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.