| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | — | NTDP-U18 | 41 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.342 | 0.2648 | 0.2694 | 1.2710 | 1.2931 |
| 2024-25 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.231 | 0.1790 | 0.1737 | 0.8590 | 0.8335 |
| 2025-26 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 27 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.407 | 0.2504 | 0.2490 | 1.2003 | 1.1938 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.