IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lachlan Getz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 25 3 10 13 0.520 0.1467 0.1467 0.2380 0.2380
2020-21 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1862 0.1862 0.7286 0.7286
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 3 19 22 0.407 0.1518 0.1456 0.5936 0.5693
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 32 0 5 5 0.156
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 38 0 8 8 0.210
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA — 28 1 2 3 0.107
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10688
Defenseman overall
#2251
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2002-03
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.