← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Jarman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 35 1 2 3 0.086 0.0340 0.0370 0.0900 0.0979
2019-20 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 50 4 13 17 0.340 0.1347 0.1347 0.3570 0.3570
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 13 2 3 5 0.385 0.1524 0.1524 0.4038 0.4038
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2020-21 · Boston University
+258.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14125
Defenseman overall
#2416
Defenseman born in 2001
#4674
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2001-02
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2009-10
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.