← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Gray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 North York Rangers OJHL 47 8 3 11 0.234 0.0654 0.0684 0.1615 0.1690
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 40 3 11 14 0.350 0.0978 0.0988 0.2415 0.2438
2006-07 Burlington Cougars OJHL 46 21 23 44 0.957 0.2672 0.2564 0.6601 0.6334
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 24 7 11 18 0.750
2009-10 Connecticut College D3 JR 23 1 6 7 0.304
2008-09 Connecticut College D3 SO 25 1 11 12 0.480
2007-08 Connecticut College D3 FR 23 5 9 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2007-08 · Connecticut College
+267.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24798
Forward overall
#959
Forward born in 1987
#2068
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.