icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | New England Jr. Huskies | EJHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2005-06 | — | OJHL | 45 | 18 | 19 | 37 | 0.822 | 0.2297 | 0.2345 | 0.5674 | 0.5792 |
| 2006-07 | Markham Waxers | OJHL | 47 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 0.447 | 0.1248 | 0.1211 | 0.3083 | 0.2993 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Nichols | D3 | CNE | SR | 26 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.654 |
| 2009-10 | Nichols | D3 | — | JR | 16 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.312 |
| 2008-09 | Nichols | D3 | — | SO | 28 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 0.536 |
| 2007-08 | Nichols | D3 | — | FR | 17 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.765 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.