IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaret Babych Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 55 7 7 14 0.255 0.0981 0.1064 0.3704 0.4019
2012-13 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 12 5 17 0.347 0.1337 0.1388 0.5048 0.5239
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 47 11 10 21 0.447 0.1722 0.1708 0.6502 0.6448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 21 9 5 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2014-15 · UMass Dartmouth
+393.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39069
Forward overall
#1562
Forward born in 1994
#2208
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Kingston
Utica · 2003-04
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Simons
Endicott · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.