← New Search ↗ Social Card

Haeden Ellis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-07 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.3186 0.3238 1.5993 1.6254
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 36 3 6 9 0.250 0.1446 0.1505 0.6424 0.6686
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 63 14 15 29 0.460 0.2663 0.2638 1.1827 1.1715
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27901
Forward overall
#932
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.19
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.