← New Search ↗ Social Card

Haeden Ellis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-07 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.3186 0.3238 1.6072 1.6334
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 36 3 6 9 0.250 0.1446 0.1505 0.6546 0.6813
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 63 14 15 29 0.460 0.2663 0.2638 1.2052 1.1938
2026-27 Kitchener Rangers OHL 8 2 3 5 0.625 0.3616 0.3616 1.6365 1.6365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28270
Forward overall
#977
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2016-17
0.24
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.