← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Schultz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-03 Country: USA
2025 · Round 6, Pick #167  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnetonka USHS-MN 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0438 0.0438 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Minnetonka USHS-MN 31 14 22 36 1.161 0.1470 0.1470 0.2821 0.2821
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0536 0.0574 0.2730 0.2925
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 14 25 39 0.672 0.3966 0.4048 2.0195 2.0611
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 49 17 25 42 0.857 0.5056 0.4916 2.5742 2.5029
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10094
Forward overall
#341
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2018-19
0.72
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
BCHL 2012-13
0.16
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2015-16
0.44
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2012-13
0.16
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.