← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wade Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-22 Country: Canada
2013 · Round 6, Pick #185  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 6 3 1 4 0.667 0.2569 0.2940 0.9702 1.1102
2010-11 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 56 7 9 16 0.286 0.1101 0.1208 0.4158 0.4563
2011-12 BCHL 60 36 55 91 1.517 0.5844 0.6093 2.2073 2.3012
2012-13 Penticton Vees BCHL 50 23 47 70 1.400 0.5394 0.5368 2.0374 2.0277
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 31 9 11 20 0.645
2015-16 Arizona State D1 NCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 16 0 1 1 0.062
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 19 0 3 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.53
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2013-14 · North Dakota
-70.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7602
Forward overall
#321
Forward born in 1993
#122
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.