| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.667 | 0.2569 | 0.2940 | 0.9702 | 1.1102 |
| 2010-11 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 56 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.286 | 0.1101 | 0.1208 | 0.4158 | 0.4563 |
| 2011-12 | — | BCHL | 60 | 36 | 55 | 91 | 1.517 | 0.5844 | 0.6093 | 2.2073 | 2.3012 |
| 2012-13 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 50 | 23 | 47 | 70 | 1.400 | 0.5394 | 0.5368 | 2.0374 | 2.0277 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | JR | 31 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.645 |
| 2015-16 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SO | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.062 |
| 2013-14 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | FR | 19 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.158 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.