IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan So Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Ajax Attack OJHL 45 7 13 20 0.444 0.1335 0.1510 0.3042 0.3440
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 35 9 16 25 0.714 0.2146 0.2319 0.4889 0.5284
2008-09 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 41 14 28 42 1.024 0.3077 0.3029 0.7012 0.6902
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 15 23 0.920
2011-12 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 20 7 6 13 0.650
2010-11 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 23 5 7 12 0.522
2009-10 Trinity D3 — FR 23 5 5 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2009-10 · Trinity
+85.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22642
Forward overall
#755
Forward born in 1989
#1233
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Collins
Hamline · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Libonati
Becker · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Avery
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.