IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan So Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Ajax Attack OJHL 45 7 13 20 0.444 0.1089 0.1232 0.3060 0.3460
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 35 9 16 25 0.714 0.1751 0.1892 0.4918 0.5315
2008-09 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 41 14 28 42 1.024 0.2511 0.2472 0.7053 0.6942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 15 23 0.920
2011-12 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 20 7 6 13 0.650
2010-11 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 23 5 7 12 0.522
2009-10 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 23 5 5 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2009-10 · Trinity
+126.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22948
Forward overall
#773
Forward born in 1989
#997
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Flanagan
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Baginski
King's · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Collins
Hamline · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.