← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Kaleta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 45 5 6 11 0.244 0.0599 0.0646 0.1681 0.1814
2005-06 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 46 7 7 14 0.304 0.0746 0.0777 0.2093 0.2181
2006-07 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 13 13 26 0.619 0.1517 0.1505 0.4257 0.4223
2007-08 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 45 8 8 16 0.356 0.0872 0.0826 0.2445 0.2315
2008-09 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 36 7 7 14 0.389 0.0953 0.0853 0.2674 0.2395
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 24 15 13 28 1.167
2011-12 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 15 5 2 7 0.467
2010-11 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 25 5 6 11 0.440
2009-10 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 25 7 2 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2009-10 · SUNY Cortland
+399.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40766
Forward overall
#1355
Forward born in 1988
#2641
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.