← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Drabicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-20 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 1 7 8 0.333 0.1966 0.2060 1.0010 1.0489
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 54 9 7 16 0.296 0.1748 0.1747 0.8899 0.8895
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29742
Forward overall
#1036
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
AJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
CCHL 2014-15
0.18
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2020-21
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.