← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Drabicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-20 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 1 7 8 0.333 0.1966 0.2060 1.0001 1.0479
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 54 9 7 16 0.296 0.1748 0.1747 0.8891 0.8887
2026-27 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30171
Forward overall
#1088
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
CCHL 2015-16
0.18
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2012-13
0.25
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.