← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Tomko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-17 Country: USA
2026 · Round 7, Pick #204  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 62 10 13 23 0.371 0.2189 0.2238 1.1143 1.1393
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 59 24 36 60 1.017 0.5999 0.5844 3.0542 2.9754
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

98%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6856
Forward overall
#176
Forward born in 2006
#466
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.94
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2023-24
0.38
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
BCHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2023-24
0.21
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.