IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Crozier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 7 14 21 0.382 0.1090 0.1098 0.2956 0.2979
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 60 11 23 34 0.567 0.1617 0.1552 0.4387 0.4210
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 47 9 13 22 0.468 0.1336 0.1204 0.3624 0.3266
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 27 1 8 9 0.333
2009-10 Neumann D3 — FR 24 5 2 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2009-10 · Neumann
+153.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30127
Forward overall
#1200
Forward born in 1988
#1061
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.