IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Crozier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 7 14 21 0.382 0.0828 0.0834 0.2954 0.2977
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 60 11 23 34 0.567 0.1229 0.1179 0.4385 0.4208
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 47 9 13 22 0.468 0.1015 0.0915 0.3622 0.3264
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 27 1 8 9 0.333
2009-10 Neumann D3 MAC FR 24 5 2 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2009-10 · Neumann
+233.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36241
Forward overall
#1224
Forward born in 1988
#895
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cullen Hennessy
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Martiniello
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.