← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Kosiba Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-17 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 39 5 5 10 0.256 0.1513 0.1566 0.7694 0.7964
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 50 7 8 15 0.300 0.1770 0.1747 0.9002 0.8883
2026-27 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.4916 0.4916 2.5005 2.5005
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33157
Forward overall
#1251
Forward born in 2007
#3265
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.09
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
BCHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2017-18
0.38
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.