← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Kosiba Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-17 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 39 5 5 10 0.256 0.1513 0.1566 0.7701 0.7971
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 50 7 8 15 0.300 0.1770 0.1747 0.9010 0.8891
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32713
Forward overall
#1207
Forward born in 2007
#3023
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
NAHL 2017-18
0.17
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.62
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2017-18
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.