IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Crowder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-26 Country: USA
2025 · Round 5, Pick #155  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 56 11 13 24 0.429 0.2528 0.2651 1.2873 1.3499
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 45 20 26 46 1.022 0.6030 0.6032 3.0701 3.0711
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6345
Forward overall
#104
Forward born in 2007
#403
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Travis Treloar
USHL 2019-20
0.80
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Matthew Weis
USHL 2013-14
0.67
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Dakota Joshua
USHL 2014-15
0.59
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
Nick Schilkey
USHL 2012-13
0.70
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.