IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lane Harbor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 40 7 2 9 0.225 0.0576 0.0628 0.1696 0.1848
2012-13 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 34 12 9 21 0.618 0.1582 0.1654 0.4655 0.4866
2013-14 — SJHL 40 8 13 21 0.525 0.1345 0.1335 0.3957 0.3928
2014-15 Melville Millionaires SJHL 53 24 16 40 0.755 0.1934 0.1818 0.5689 0.5349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2015-16 · Norwich
-10.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28689
Forward overall
#1100
Forward born in 1994
#517
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isak Tranvik
St. Olaf · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Bonito
Endicott · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock King
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.