IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Lever Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 23 4 4 8 0.348 0.0852 0.0870 0.2395 0.2444
2006-07 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 44 4 11 15 0.341 0.0836 0.0811 0.2347 0.2278
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2009-10 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2008-09 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2007-08 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#46201
Forward overall
#1503
Forward born in 1987
#3301
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Menzies
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Perry
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.