IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Moline Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-21 Country: USA
2024 · Round 7, Pick #205  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Michigan Tech
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 59 1 20 21 0.356 0.2099 0.2051 1.0689 1.0447
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 17 1 8 9 0.529 0.3123 0.2901 1.5900 1.4772
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3640
Defenseman overall
#950
Defenseman born in 2005
#1740
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Tech Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Grant Docter
NAHL 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
John Scott
USHS-MN 2024-25
0.13
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
Kalem Parker
WHL 2024-25
0.33
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
Jake Crespi
USHL 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Somers
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Van Natter
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.