← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elliot Gulley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-29 Country: USA
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 46 6 17 23 0.500 0.1837 0.1982 0.5278 0.5695
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 8 10 18 0.486 0.2870 0.2820 1.4612 1.4357
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 24 27 51 0.823 0.4853 0.4534 2.4706 2.3081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6789
Forward overall
#226
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2020-21
0.78
actual FR PPG at Union
BCHL 2015-16
0.23
actual FR PPG at Union
NAHL 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Union
USHL 2012-13
0.89
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.