IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kristian Kostadinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-20 Country: Sweden
2023 · Round 7, Pick #220  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally
SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — SHL-J20 43 2 8 10 0.233 0.1293 0.1354 0.3099 0.3246
2023-24 — SuperElit 46 3 15 18 0.391 0.1544 0.1542 0.5314 0.5306
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 62 6 10 16 0.258 0.1523 0.1450 0.7752 0.7380
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 34 0 3 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2025-26 · Boston College
-37.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8478
Defenseman overall
#1926
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Christensen
St. Norbert · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Gibbs
Endicott · 2023-24
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.