IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Gerbner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 48 7 18 25 0.521 0.1505 0.1534 0.3921 0.3998
2016-17 — SJHL 38 11 13 24 0.632 0.1825 0.1770 0.4755 0.4611
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 8 2 3 5 0.625
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 28 4 6 10 0.357
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 21 3 8 11 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2017-18 · Plymouth State
+265.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24472
Forward overall
#1064
Forward born in 1997
#810
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Serpico
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2015-16
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.