← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Plante Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-10 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Minnesota Duluth
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 NTDP-U18 51 13 22 35 0.686 0.5459 0.5567 2.5703 2.6212
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 50 19 21 40 0.800 0.6363 0.6141 2.9962 2.8915
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2348
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Duluth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2015-16
0.95
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.11
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2013-14
0.45
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2015-16
0.63
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.