IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aurelio Garcia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-03 Country: USA
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 57 4 10 14 0.246 0.1826 0.1883 0.9164 0.9452
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 51 11 6 17 0.333 0.2477 0.2419 1.2437 1.2147
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28027
Forward overall
#429
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brennan Ali
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Dawson Cook
USHL 2012-13
0.06
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Jack Jenkins
USHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Landon Slaggert
USHL 2019-20
0.88
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.