← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finlay Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 40 11 20 31 0.775 0.2986 0.2986 1.1279 1.1279
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 15 5 13 18 1.200 0.4624 0.4624 1.7464 1.7464
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 27 12 25 37 1.370 0.5280 0.5385 1.9943 2.0339
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 14 1 4 5 0.357 0.2107 0.1894 1.0725 0.9642
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen 34 3 10 13 0.382
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 19 1 1 2 0.105
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Notre Dame
-81.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11253
Forward overall
#504
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.