← New Search ↗ Social Card

Finlay Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 40 11 20 31 0.775 0.2887 0.2887 1.1293 1.1293
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 15 5 13 18 1.200 0.4470 0.4470 1.7485 1.7485
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 27 12 25 37 1.370 0.5105 0.5206 1.9968 2.0365
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 14 1 4 5 0.357 0.2195 0.1973 1.0521 0.9458
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen 34 3 10 13 0.382
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 19 1 1 2 0.105
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Notre Dame
-81.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10789
Forward overall
#480
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.